ION vs 04 Cav - Performance Forum

Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.
ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, October 28, 2003 5:53 PM
Sorry - I couldn't resist.

I suppose if the ION wasn't so overweight... it would have a chance...

<br>

03 sedan "ecotec" powered.
93 RS
87RS

Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:02 PM
oooooo dont pick on the little red haird kid.lololol <br>


. member 1244or55
.http://www22.ocn.ne.jp/~cavalier
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:08 PM
I haven't weighed mine, but the sales brochure says it weighs 2653lbs. Which I believe is lighter than my Cav.

sig not found
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, October 28, 2003 6:39 PM
That'd be roughly 100 pounds lighter than mine even though it's a 2002. I don't think there's been that much of a weight change over 2003 and 2004.


Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 2:58 PM
Saturn's are Plastic bodied, not steel.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 4:14 PM
Plastic doesnt mean lighter, if you had a clue as to what a space frame was you would realize that the plastic bolts to a pretty strudy metal frame that goes throughout the underside of the panels. Just like a Fiero which contrary to popular belief is NOT a light weight car it weighs in just around 2700 pounds. The Ion being a much larger car then the Fiero would suggest its space frame being heavier.


208whp 239wtq
13.7 @ 102mph 2.19 60'
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 6:22 PM
Mj H wrote:if you had a clue as to what a space frame was
What a d*ck, I realize that it bolts to metal, but aren't those body panels lighter? And as Todd Miller posted, In the brochure it says it is around 2600lbs, so obviously it isn't heavier. Man too bad I didn't have a clue, I thought the WHOLES CAR was PLASTIC. <br>


Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:07 PM
Alright you two... chill out. Instead of being assholes like on the Org, why not be cool about it and just stay on topic with no flaming? <br>


Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Thursday, October 30, 2003 4:50 PM
truebluels watch the language man !!!! use the $$ instead please

and i thought the ION were around the same wieght as the grand ams

<br>



Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:22 PM
Hey, I expected to be censored out. <br>


Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Friday, October 31, 2003 10:03 PM
Anyways, I'm pretty sure if you compared weights, the ION is
just a bit heavier. and it's not just the plastic either. They build
these things pretty heavy duty, to take crashes and the like.
And to take the abuse of those owners too...



<br>

03 sedan "ecotec" powered.
93 RS
87RS

Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Sunday, November 02, 2003 10:59 PM
03 ion quad coupe 5spd: 2756
Auto: 2808

04 cavalier: 2617


<br>

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

If I had a dime for every time I saw Echotec, errr, Ecotec spelled wrong, I'd be rich!
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Monday, November 17, 2003 9:33 AM
My Grand Am is supposed to weigh about 3100lbs, man what a weight disadvantage.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Friday, December 12, 2003 2:25 PM
saturn actually used steel in body panels? hmm i thought they were just made out of melted down rubber maid cans.. =)
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Saturday, December 13, 2003 1:03 PM
Todd Miller wrote:


my 03 is 36 lbs less than your Ion, my car weights 2617lbs. <br>


Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 8:26 AM
Brian Coggon wrote:My Grand Am is supposed to weigh about 3100lbs, man what a weight disadvantage.


And i thought my L series had a weight disadvantage...
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Tuesday, January 13, 2004 5:15 PM
saturns are made out of old rubbermaid cans so i heard... lol
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Wednesday, January 14, 2004 8:47 PM
that maybe so but look at all the cars now using a Saturn Engine
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Friday, January 23, 2004 5:53 PM
Hahaha, the ECO is not a Saturn engine.
The Saturn is a platform (one of many) the ECO is used in.
If you hate on Saturn, you're making fun of yourself.
Lets try to not turn this into JBO, please, too many arguments over nothing there.
I want to learn about my ECO, and this is the place to do it, as soon as more people join.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Sunday, January 25, 2004 9:28 PM
despite all weight issues, the saturn ion has a five speed auto.

the gear ratios are complete @!#$. my girlfriend has one, it is pretty good on the highway, but as far as acceloration, they really cant compete.

Kim refuses to believe our cars have the same power plant.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Monday, January 26, 2004 8:42 AM
Well if u think about it The Ecotec first came in the 2000 Saturn LS (like mine) then spread to other platforms so in that since it is a saturn engine.

Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Thursday, January 29, 2004 8:53 PM
In a sense yeah, first american ECO as far as I know.
Still, not a Saturn motor though.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Thursday, January 29, 2004 9:04 PM
the other engines that are "Ecotec" are not built the same way as our 2.2 and the true name of those are Ecotech. Just do some research on the subject
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Sunday, May 16, 2004 9:15 AM
sounds like it was an auto ION.
Re: ION vs 04 Cav
Monday, May 17, 2004 8:20 PM
wouldnt gm make that engine? and if im right it then all of you guys are wrong?
Forum Post / Reply
You must log in before you can post or reply to messages.

 

Start New Topic Advanced Search