KevinP (Stabby McShankyou) wrote:No use in arguing with a wall. I presented credible sources, you continue to crawfish. I provided common facts to debunk the myths that are usually orally defecated regarding military personnel.
I will take that as your conceding that you, in fact, do NOT have any credible sources, also to concede that you did not even bother to read those links, and that you also concede that you, of your own want, have thought you have gotten under my skin.
Really, until you post something credible that states that even the Army's average IQ is lower than 68th percentile average Americans, you have lost, and will continue to have lost this argument. Continuation will only serve to make you look more like a moron, and make me look like a moron trainer.
You talk trash, say something about my sand being full of vaginas, but plain and simple, you haven't backed up your argument; only continued to orally defecate and give us a glimpse of what is inside that rectum between your ears.
oh, and nice tat night rider.
R.W.E. of the J.B.O. wrote:LOL. Bill gets his ass handed to him in a debate again, and obliviously claims that person is conceding to his superior reasoning skills.
Bill, people are not saying "I cant handle this, man!" to you, they're saying "you're too stupid to try to have an intelligent debate with, and I'm no longer participating in your childish pissing contest."
You ignore any facts that prove you wrong, change your argument when you finally realize you're losing, and bring the level of every thread in this forum down to the level of a preschool namecalling fight. Quite simply, you're incapable of having an intelligent adult level discussion, and everyone tires of your purile crying. Meanwhile, you sit at your computer until the wee hours of the night just hoping someone will repond to you. Pathetic.
What's really pathetic is how hard you try to get under everyone's skin, when it's obvious that you're the one getting frustrated. Time to grow up, bud.
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:Quikbitch the Troll..
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:Oh and yes...before we proceed, I need Quik to...(more chest pounding)...Says the one who accused me of being the troll. This is probably the closest admission to the reality of the situation you've posted. It's all about needing that internet fight for you. Hence your inability to have an adult discussion, or admit when you've been proven wrong. The hilarity of how desperate you are is epic. Keep swinging your e-dick all you want, but at the end of the day, you're the one stuck at the computer waiting for someone to acknowledge your importance.
ThatGuy85 wrote:All I'm saying, is if we can't prove that the average IQ of the military recruit has dropped over x number of years, your argument that the average soldier isn't intelligent enough to figure out what's REALLY going on is pretty much null. Which, when you think about it, seems like a ridiculous argument in the first place. If someone throws you in the middle of the jungle, would you rather be stuck with a college professor, or someone who's actually lived there for a few years and knows not to @!#$ with the red and blue snake?
Quote:
You've managed to stay reasonably civil, so you earn a reply.
Quote:
Your move
Quote:
There is sufficent proof extant to show that the average IQ of the ARMY (not military) recruit has dropped over recent years. The most glaring proof is the Army's own reduction of admission standards of intelligence...
Quote:
If you recall, the concept in this thread was that a soldier who was expressing outright racial hatred had expressed glee at said hatred right down to getting a tattoo to immortalize this hatred.
Quote:
that said racist grunt knows more about the sociopolitical situation in this war-torn country than any one else could, by the simple virtue of having been placed there with a weapon.
Quote:
Further, being dropped into a war zone with minimal education can make him or her a bit skewed in perspective...for some, they will even descend into outright racial hatred, such as our OP.
ThatGuy85 wrote:Quote:
You've managed to stay reasonably civil, so you earn a reply.
Quote:
Your move
Lets try to keep the theatrics to a minimum.
Quote:
There is sufficent proof extant to show that the average IQ of the ARMY (not military) recruit has dropped over recent years. The most glaring proof is the Army's own reduction of admission standards of intelligence...
The reasons behind this boil down to needing more recruits. The enlisted forces, and especially the army, suck. They were having a hard time convincing people that getting shot at while having sand in your ass crack was cool. But they didn't even lower the standards much at all, something that IIRC was discussed earlier in this thread.
Quote:
If you recall, the concept in this thread was that a soldier who was expressing outright racial hatred had expressed glee at said hatred right down to getting a tattoo to immortalize this hatred.
I really don't think it's that racist. And the hatred is to be expected. The terrorists hate us, is it wrong to hate them? I'm sure the OP has been shot at, his friends have been shot at, some killed or seriously wounded. You almost sound like he should take the approach of "Well, the one guy with the AK shot at me, but maybe he won't do it again if I tell him he's being a bad boy"
Quote:
that said racist grunt knows more about the sociopolitical situation in this war-torn country than any one else could, by the simple virtue of having been placed there with a weapon.
Look. Lets be honest with ourselves here. Neither one of us have ever been in the armed forces. We have never been in a war zone. We're just two people on a car forum discussing theory. But why would you need to have a doctorate in psychology, or whatever, to know that the guy shooting at you is a terrorist, and that you should shoot him back?
Quote:
Further, being dropped into a war zone with minimal education can make him or her a bit skewed in perspective...for some, they will even descend into outright racial hatred, such as our OP.
Yes, having a skewed perspective is certainly possible, but I'm sure very, VERY few soldiers roll into town and start shooting everyone who had the audacity to not be white. I don't think it's rocket science figuring out who's the good guys and who's not.
Take my buddy Ryan for example. He's done two tours in Iraq. Here's a couple pictures I found on his facebook. Given his average intelligence, how did he figure out that these iraqi's wouldn't kill him? (Yes, I realize they're all kids, but that's not the point)
CBS Article wrote:So the Army is accepting a growing number of new recruits with everythging from health and weight issues to lower academic test scores to criminal records.
Quote:
"DUI, drug paraphernalia charges, more than three curfew violations," Garcia says. "It could be anything minor or some stuff major."
Counter-Recruitment wrote:The cognitive revolution in the military started in 2005 when the Pentagon decided that in order to meet its goal of recruiting 80,000 new soldiers it would have to allow 10 percent of those new recruits to be young men and women who had never graduated high school nor earned a General Equivalency Diploma.
ParaPundit wrote:Recruiting shortfalls as young men decide Iraq is not worth dying for have led the US Army to announce yet another lowering of standards on recruits.
Take Back the Repuplican Party wrote:Well, the recruiting standards WERE dropped, and they weren't all that amazing to begin with. That's fact...and fact is proof.LOL. That's an opinion, not fact. According to you, it's useless:
Take Back the Republican Party wrote: Just remember...opinions are like @!#$s, and no matter how hard you try, you can't make someone else's smell like yours!
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:As I've said everything I have to say, and we seem to now just be in a repetitive loop, I am going to step down. I've got some time demands that preclude me from participating in as much forum-wrangling for the time being.With this:
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:You look rather weak when you back down from a challenge to proide proof of an allegation you make.Your self-ownage is thoroughly amusing. Pure hypocrisy. You know, that word you love to throw around, when in fact you're a poster child for it?
ScottAWhite wrote:Its cute that he's playing with the kids.....but I mostly like how his buddies are just waiting for one them or their uncles to start some @#$@#
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:I provided the proof, I discussed the points, I walked away satisfied. You should try it sometime.Epic.
Take Back the Republican Party wrote:As I've said, Quik...any of those threads that piss you off so much to see me as the last poster...bring one back and take me on.They don't piss me off. You flatter yourself to think it does. Why I've pointed it out before is that it's an example of your desperate need to constantly get the last word in. It's why there are so few that post in this forum these days. People get sick of seeing your ignorance spewed over every single thread, and I'm not the only one telling you this.
Bill the dillusional wrote:THAT is the ulitmate ownage, to have humiliated you so completely, so repeatedly, that you now just hide behind trees and take cheap shots when you can.You've humliated no one but yourself, and you just don't see it. But go ahead and keep trying, bud. If nothing else, at least you can say that you haven't given up. LMAO.